A recent report published by The Times has highlighted the devastating financial impact that long-term care can have on families.
The original Times article is available to paid subscribers, so we have rewritten the story in our own words to make the key issues easier to understand and explain what they could mean for homeowners and their families.
A lifetime of saving can disappear surprisingly quickly
The Times recently reported the story of Frances Jordan, a woman who worked into her 70s and had carefully built up savings during her lifetime.
When she developed dementia and eventually needed care, her family faced a very different financial reality.
🛡️ Worried About Losing Your Home to Care Fees?
Many UK homeowners don’t realise their property can be used to pay for care fees. Get free advice before a crisis hits and protect what you’ve worked your whole life for.
Request Your Free Estate Planning ReviewAccording to the report, approximately £250,000 was ultimately spent on her care.
Her family also sought NHS Continuing Healthcare funding, but the application was unsuccessful. As her care needs increased, the cost of looking after her became a significant financial burden.
The case illustrates something that many homeowners may not realise until it is too late:
Having worked hard, paid your mortgage and saved for retirement does not necessarily mean your home and savings are protected if you later need long-term care.
There is still no general cap on care costs
For years, governments have discussed reforming the way social care is funded.
A lifetime cap on care costs was previously proposed, with plans for an £86,000 cap and a much higher £100,000 capital threshold. However, those reforms were not implemented.
Today, the position is very different.
For the 2026/27 financial year, the Government has confirmed that the upper capital limit remains £23,250, while the lower limit remains £14,250.
Someone with assets above the upper threshold can be responsible for the full cost of their care in a care home, subject to the detailed rules and any assets that are disregarded under the regulations.
In other words, there is currently no general £86,000 lifetime protection for homeowners in England.
What happens to the family home?
The family home can be particularly important.
Whether a property is taken into account depends on the circumstances. For example, there are circumstances where the value of a person’s main home can be disregarded, including certain situations involving a qualifying relative continuing to live there.
But if the property is taken into account in a financial assessment, its value can have a major impact on whether someone is required to contribute towards their care.
This is why waiting until someone needs care can be too late to start thinking about estate planning.
Can you legally plan ahead?
This is where early estate planning can become important.
There are legitimate estate-planning arrangements that may help families plan how assets are owned and passed on. Depending on the individual’s circumstances, this can include reviewing property ownership, wills and certain types of trusts.
However, there is an important distinction between legitimate forward planning and simply giving assets away to avoid paying care fees.
Local authorities can investigate whether assets have been deliberately deprived in order to avoid care charges. Therefore, transferring a property after someone already expects to need care is not a guaranteed way of protecting it.
The key issue is timing and professional advice.
The biggest mistake can be waiting until you need care
The story reported by The Times is a reminder that care planning isn’t simply something to think about when a person enters a care home.
By that point, many of the decisions that could have been considered years earlier may no longer be appropriate or available.
Estate planning is therefore something worth considering while you are still fit, healthy and able to make your own decisions.
It is not about assuming that you will need care.
It is about asking:
“If I did need care in the future, what would happen to my home, my savings and the inheritance I want to leave behind?”
There is no need to wait for another Government announcement
Successive governments have discussed social-care reform, but the current system still leaves many people facing means-tested care costs.
The previously proposed £86,000 lifetime cap did not become the protection that many people expected.
And as things stand in 2026, there is no general Government scheme that guarantees homeowners will not have to use their assets towards the cost of care.
That means families who want to understand their options should not necessarily wait for politicians to provide the answer.
Could your family be at risk?
If you own a property and have built up savings over your lifetime, it is worth understanding how the current care-funding rules could affect you.
There may be legitimate estate-planning options that could help you plan for the future, but these need to be considered before a crisis occurs and with appropriate professional advice.
The earlier you understand your options, the more choices you may have.
Don’t wait until a family member needs care to start asking what will happen to your estate.
A recent report published by The Times has highlighted the devastating financial impact that long-term care can have on families. The original …
When someone dies, their family often has to deal with a long list of practical and legal responsibilities at a time when …
When Eddie Winn’s mother died, he thought her wishes were perfectly clear. Mary had left a Will stating that her estate should …
Why does probate cost so much? It’s a question many families ask when they discover just how much can be deducted from …
Most people know roughly what their home is worth. Far fewer know how much of it their family would actually inherit if …
Deciding when to retire is one of the biggest financial and lifestyle decisions you may make. Some people dream of retiring as …
